Search
Search
Increasing cell densities and titers are reshaping harvest workflows, placing added pressure on clarification and introducing variability that can affect downstream process (DSP) operations. As processes intensify, managing solids, DNA, and soluble impurities without expanding clarification trains can become more complex. Our next-generation harvest and clarification technology leverages functionalized fibers for charge-based separation, consolidating clarification into a single-stage operation.
Select a chromatographic approach based on how solids are managed upstream and how clarification integrates with existing infrastructure. Direct clarification and centrate clarification represent two common approaches.
The choice between direct clarification and centrate clarification is based on upstream configuration and solids management strategy. Cell density, impurity profile, facility infrastructure, throughput targets, and desired clarified fluid quality should be considered when selecting the appropriate platform.
Table 1. Compare clarification platforms
| Harvest RC Chromatographic Clarifier | Harvest RC Centrate Chromatographic Clarifier | |
| Type of clarification | Direct clarification | Centrate clarification |
| Technology platform | Quaternary amine (Q) functionalized polypropylene nonwoven |
|
| Mechanism | Anion exchange (AEX) chromatography | AEX |
| Materials | Synthetic | Synthetic |
| Feedstream | Direct harvest and clarification | Centrate clarification |
| Scalability | Linear scalability from lab to multi-capsule commercial production (including screening tools) | Linear scalability from lab to multi-capsule commercial production |
| Water-flushable | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|
|
| Learn more |
As harvest workflows move from development to manufacturing, maintaining clarified fluid quality becomes increasingly important. Chromatographic clarification is designed to scale predictably, helping teams maintain the same separation behavior across volumes and sites. This consistency helps reduce variability during scale-up and scale-out across sites or manufacturing footprints as processes transition into clinical and commercial production.
Chromatographic clarification is commonly evaluated as harvest workflows evolve toward higher cell densities and intensified upstream conditions, where conventional size-based clarification alone may become limiting. It can consolidate clarification steps by enabling removal of both soluble and insoluble impurities, including submicron particle populations, while simplifying process design. This approach is often considered during process development and scale-up to support consistent clarified fluid quality, downstream filtration, and chromatography across development and manufacturing stages.
Chromatographic clarification leverages charge-functionalized fibrous media to retain negatively charged soluble and insoluble impurities while the target molecule flows through, conditioning harvest streams for downstream processing. In contrast, depth filtration relies primarily on size-based retention and mechanical entrapment within a porous matrix.
In certain workflows, chromatographic clarification can consolidate clarification steps by removing cells, cell debris, and soluble impurities through charge-based interactions in a single operation. When feedstream characteristics allow, this approach may reduce reliance on centrifugation or multi-stage depth filtration and is typically evaluated during process development or scale-up.
Fiber chromatographic clarification supports scale-up and technology transfer by using a consistent platform and separation mechanism across process scales. Linear scalability and single-use formats help teams apply the same clarification approach from lab through manufacturing. This platform's consistency reduces variability between sites, simplifies scale-out decisions, and helps lower risk as processes move through development, clinical production, and commercial manufacturing.
Fiber chromatography performance during harvest is influenced by upstream and operating conditions. Performance can be impacted by feedstream composition, including solids and impurity load, often characterized by packed cell volume and turbidity.
Intended use of the products mentioned on this page vary. For specific intended use statements, please refer to the Instructions for Use for the product.