iCE™ 3500 AAS 原子吸收光谱仪
iCE™ 3500 AAS 原子吸收光谱仪
Thermo Scientific™

iCE™ 3500 AAS 原子吸收光谱仪

作为所有 AA 领域的极佳仪器,Thermo Scientific& 的双重火焰 ™ 石墨炉 iCE™ 3500 AAS 提供卓越的元素分析能力。
Have Questions?
更改视图buttonViewtableView
货号类型
942350023500原子吸收光谱仪
942350023501原子吸收光谱仪
货号 942350023500
价格(CNY)
-
类型:
原子吸收光谱仪

Thermo Scientific™ iCE™ 3500 AAS 提供无与伦比的性能、灵活性和简便性。创新的双原子化器设计让您在火焰和石墨炉之间实现安全的、由软件控制的切换,并且只需一次镜像移动。高精度双光束光学装置与一个阶梯光栅单色器结合,实现低检测限和长期的分析稳定性。作为标准,提供性能有保证的独特四线氘灯背景校正。 火焰原子化器设计集成了 50 mm 钛燃烧器,固体能力提升,提高了火焰分析的效率和准确度。石墨炉原子化器包括 GFTV,这是一套石墨炉可视系统,它通过提供石墨管内部的高清晰度、实时视频,来提高效率和简化方法开发。

最大幅度地提高生产效率
这款仪器是结合了火焰和石墨炉的 AAS 系统,为面临挑战性检测限和需要高样品通量的实验室提供完整的解决方案。

  • 由软件控制,进行火焰到石墨炉分析的自动切换,甚至无需操作人员在场
  • 使用可全面设置的自动进样器,进行无人照看的自动化分析
  • SOLAAR 软件通过向导、优化过程和自动化仪器性能控制,提供无与伦比的支持
  • 6 个自动准直灯的转盘,可最大程度提高光通量

提升成本效益
着眼于硬件和附件的成本效益设计,获得最大的使用效益。

  • 创新的长寿命石墨管(ELC),可降低耗材成本,可进行数千次的烧灼
  • 仅使用以微升计算的样品即可进行分析,最大程度降低耗材的消耗
  • 通过智能软件控制气流,保持最低的气体使用量
  • GFTV 实时查看,可反复进行精确的分析

尽享先进的仪器性能和灵活性
您对 Thermo Scientific 仪器期望的所有创新性、性能和易用性,都是 iCE 3500 AAS 的标准配置。

  • 独特的双原子化器设计,提供第二个样品室,在其中可以让石墨炉永久地维持在光路对准状态,并且随时可以使用
  • 作为标准,D2 背景校正可用于火焰和石墨炉的分析
  • 通过可选购的 Thermo Scientific™ GFS35Z™ 炉升级件可提供塞曼背景校正功能,用于石墨炉分析
  • 拥有双单色器的双束光学装置,含有一个中阶梯光栅和棱镜
规格
背景校正联系我们
火焰雾化器联系我们
炉雾化器选项联系我们
炉可视系统联系我们
气体管理联系我们
旋转式灯联系我们
光栅联系我们
光学联系我们
光电倍增管联系我们
类型原子吸收光谱仪
Unit SizeEach

常见问题解答 (FAQ)

What is a segmented flow sample introduction system and how can it help me?

Segmented flow sample introduction systems are a very helpful tool to increase the productivity in your laboratory. Such devices work with a valve system that enables fast uptake of the sample to the plasma, and minimize the wash out times between different samples. Therefore, the time required for analysis can be shortened considerably. An example for such a system is the sprint valve system available on the Thermo Scientific iCAP 7600 ICP-OES (https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/842320076121).

Can slurry nebulization be used with pharmaceutical products?

Slurry nebulization is more commonly used in environmental testing applications. In principle, slurry nebulization can be used for pharmaceutical testing and there have been studies done on this. Obviously particle size is a key factor here - the smaller the particles the better. However, it is also worth pointing out that the method preferred by USP is microwave digestion.

When analyzing elemental impurities in phramaceutical samples, how is the method detection limit calculated and how is it related to the parameter instrumental detection limit and blank equivalent concentration?

The parameters BEC, LOD, and LOQ are frequently used to describe the detection capabilities of an analytical instrument. The acronym BEC abbreviates the parameter blank equivalent concentration. This value refers to the “apparent concentration”, and is composed of the contamination level in the blank, any residual interference signal, and the instrument background (from the detection system). The parameter instrumental detection limit (IDL, often referred to as Limit of Detection, LOD) is defined as the limit of detection that can be achieved by the instrument used. This amount is typically defined as a quantity that gives a distinguishable signal in the detection system. The common definition for the IDL is based upon the standard deviation (LOD = 3.3 x standard deviation of the regression line of calibration curve) of a blank sample measured in the beginning of a calibration curve, or a minimum signal to noise ratio of 3:1. Both parameters, BEC and IDL are automatically calculated by Thermo Scientific Qtegra Intelligent Scientific Data Solution (ISDS) platform software (https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/IQLAAEGABSFAOVMBCZ). In contrast, on the IDL, the parameter method detection limit (MDL) includes the extent of all dilution steps carried out during the sample preparation. The MDL is typically based upon a blank solution that has been prepared according to the preparation procedure that is being used to prepare all the samples. In situations where there is no sample preparation or if the preparation involves a single dilution step, MDLs might be calculated based on the standard deviation of a low level standard. MDL concentrations are always more conservative than IDL concentrations.

How does the format of my sample impact dilution when analyzing elemental impurities in pharmaceutical drug products?

If samples are in solid form, the dilution incurred will be dictated by the digestion procedure being used to prepare the sample for analysis. If samples are being analyzed in their native form or after simple dilution, there may be more flexibility in the dilution factor used during preparation. Regardless of the sample's original form, the sample matrix must contain a tolerable level of dissolved solids prior to introducing it into the instrument. If an ICP-MS is being used for analysis, the sample matrix should contain 0.2% TDS or, if no special configuration for the sample introduction system is used (e.g., utilizing AGD).

What is the best choice for an internal standard to be used with pharmaceutical samples?

Internal standards are used in many applications to correct for potential drifts in instrumental sensitivity over time or changes in the sample matrix. The selection of a suitable internal standard should include the following aspects: - The internal standard should have a first ionization potential similar to the analyte, and should have a similar mass as the analyte.
- The internal standard must not be part of the sample.
- It should not generate or be affected by spectral interferences.
- It should be at a low and uniform (preferably zero) concentration in all samples.

Although ICP-MS is a technique considered by some to be relatively robust with respect to matrix effects, in reality, matrix effects do commonly exist and the use of internal standards is standard practice. Internal standards also help account for changes in the transport efficiency of the sample through aerosol.