Search
Search
At Thermo Fisher Scientific, we understand that customers must manage and mitigate bioburden contamination risks as process fluids are prepared and used, intermediate steps are protected, and final fill is completed. Integrating sterile membrane solutions and single-use fluid management assemblies throughout the workflow helps manage bioburden risk more effectively and with greater intent.
Understanding how operating conditions affect filtration behavior helps teams anticipate performance limits and plan more effectively.
When selecting sterile filtration solutions, teams should account for multiple process requirements. Sterilizing and bioburden filtration steps often need to accommodate fluid characteristics, pressure behavior, operating expectations, and scale considerations simultaneously. Evaluating membrane chemistry, pore size, and format in the context of the workflow helps align filtration choices with the role of sterile filtration within broader bioprocess filtration strategies.
LifeASSURE membrane filters are applied across sterile and bioburden filtration steps, with a range of membrane materials, retention ratings, and configurations to address different process conditions. Several series incorporate Advanced Pleat Technology (APT), which is designed to increase usable membrane surface area while maintaining open flow paths between pleats.
Compare LifeASSURE membrane filters by material, rating, and typical applications to support process-driven selection.
Table 1. LifeASSURE membrane filters
|
LifeASSURE PDA filters |
LifeASSURE PNA filters |
LifeASSURE PLA filters | LifeASSURE PFS filters |
Material description |
Polyethersulfone (PES) |
Polyethersulfone (PES) |
Nylon 6,6 |
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) |
Water affinity |
Hydrophilic |
Hydrophilic |
Hydrophilic |
Hydrophobic |
Membrane layers |
Double-layer membrane filter |
Single-layer membrane filter |
Single-layer with multi-zone membrane filter |
Single-layer membrane filter |
Advanced pleat technology |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Radial pleat |
Rating |
Sterilizing grade |
Bioburden rated |
Bioburden rated |
Sterilizing grade |
| Suggested applications | Buffer, media feedstreams, serum and blood fractions, vaccines, biologics, high-purity deionized water and water for injection systems, pharmaceutical chemicals | Buffer, media feedstreams, serum and blood fractions, vaccines, biologics, high-purity deionized water and water for injection systems, pharmaceutical chemicals | Prefiltration and bioburden reduction, protection of sterilizing-grade membrane in pharmaceutical, biological, and bioprocessing industries | Air and gases |
| Available pore sizes (µm) | 0.10, 0.20 | 0.20, 0.45 | 0.20, 0.45, 0.65, 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Explore LifeASSURE PNA Filter Cartridges |
Membrane Filter formats can be configured to align with the operational model of the process. Cartridge filters installed in reusable stainless-steel housings are often selected for fixed installations with established cleaning or sterilization practices. Single-use capsule formats are used when flexibility, simplified setup, or reduced handling steps are priorities, particularly in single-use workflows. Selecting between formats involves considering batch size, facility layout, equipment integration, and how filtration fits into routine operations.
Filtration steps positioned as bioburden reduction are commonly applied throughout the bioprocess workflow to help reduce microorganisms and particulates in process fluids. Sterilizing-grade filtration is applied at the end of the process, prior to filling the drug substance or finished drug product, where defined membrane retention characteristics are used to control viable microorganisms.
Filter pore size is selected based on process risk, target microorganisms, and where the filtration step sits in the workflow. Sterilizing-grade filtration commonly uses nominal pore sizes, such as 0.2 µm, with 0.1 µm applied in specific cases where smaller organisms are a consideration. Larger pore sizes, such as 0.45 µm or above, are used for bioburden reduction earlier in the process.
Filter integrity testing is performed before use, after use, or at both points, depending on how the filtration step is designed and operated. Pre-use testing helps confirm that the filter is properly installed and undamaged before processing begins. Post-use testing is used to verify that filter integrity was maintained throughout the run. These checks support operational confidence by confirming expected filter performance under process conditions.
As processes scale, increases in batch volume, flow rate, and filtration time can change how membranes behave in operation across the workflow. Higher volumes may lead to greater pressure development, earlier operational limits, or longer exposure to process conditions. These factors can affect filter sizing, format selection, and operating parameters. Addressing scale-related considerations during process development helps teams anticipate how sterile and bioburden filtration steps will perform as processes move into manufacturing.
Intended use of the products mentioned on this page vary. For specific intended use statements, please refer to the Instructions for Use for the product.