Search
Search
View additional product information for Quant-iT™ Protein Assay Kit - FAQs (Q33210)
52 product FAQs found
负的荧光值物理上是不可能的。它是由于软件自动扣除背景信号而造成的假象。这意味着你的荧光计检测到背景信号并将其扣除从而牺牲了真实数据。务必做一个仅有缓冲液的对照并评估信号的类型。你可能需要换用另外一块板。
是的，使用手册中有关于此项应用的说明。你将使用0 ng/μL lambda dsDNA HS标准品制备Standard #1。你将稀释一个10 ng/μL lambda dsDNA HS标准品得到Standard #2。然后你准备样本并将它们和上述的两点标准曲线进行比较。Quant-iT dsDNA BR试剂盒也可以用类似的方式使用。
试剂盒中的缓冲液将保证合适的pH值范围，即使您的DNA处于这一pH范围之外也没关系，因为检测中所用的缓冲液体积至少超过样本体积的10倍。
PicoGreen染料和其它基于荧光定量的试剂不建议用于对染料偶联的核酸进行定量。核酸上携带的染料基团会干扰定量试剂的结合或荧光产生。
大致在20-mer或更短范围内的链信号水平较低。对于大部分由短链组成的dsDNA样本，仍可使用试剂，但应使用与样本长度相当的dsDNA标准品。
Qubit荧光计拥有高度优化的算法，可以使用 Qubit assays 或 Quant-iT DNA assays为您计算样本的浓度。使用MyQubit固件， Quant-iT PicoGreen DNA Assay也适用于Qubit荧光计。所有这些检测试剂的性能表现是相似的。
Quant-iT PicoGreen DNA Assay是最成熟和最通用的检测试剂。它需要标准品DNA和缓冲液的稀释，但是可以使用比色皿，微孔板和NanoDrop 3300进行测定。
Quant-iT DNA Assay提供了一个现成的缓冲液和预稀释的标准品DNA，可以使用96孔的微孔板来分析大量样本(>20个样本)，而无需进一步的调整。< br / >
Qubit Assay适用于低通量（<20个样本）实验，并且仅能用Qubit荧光计读取数据。
是的，对于Qubit (1.0)荧光计之后的Qubit设备是可以的。点击此处（https://www.thermofisher.com/cn/zh/home/industrial/spectroscopy-elemental-isotope-analysis/molecular-spectroscopy/fluorometers/qubit/qubit-assays/myqubit.html）查看MyQubit检测说明。
通常来说，样本越干净越好。一些盐、蛋白、以及去垢剂不会影响检测，您可以查看特定的检测方案以了解哪些物质以及它们在哪些浓度下不会影响检测。
Negative fluorescence is a physical impossibility. It is an artifact from software autocorrecting for background signal. This means your reader is picking up and subtracting out background light at the cost of your data. Make sure to do a buffer-only control and assess the type of signal. You may need to switch to a different plate.
Yes, the manual has directions for this application. You will use the 0 ng/µL lambda dsDNA HS standard to generate Standard #1. You will prepare a dilution of the 10 ng/µL lambda dsDNA HS standard to generate Standard #2. You then prepare the samples and compare them to this 2-point standard curve. The Quant-iT dsDNA BR Kit can be used in a similar manner.
The buffer included in the kit should assure the proper pH range, even if your DNA is at a pH outside of this range, since at least a 10-fold excess of kit buffer over sample is used in the assay.
PicoGreen dye and other fluorescence-based quantification reagents are not recommended for quantifying dye-conjugated nucleic acids. The attached dye molecules can interfere with either binding and/or fluorescence output of the quantification reagents.
Strands that are roughly in the 20-mer range or shorter show a lower level of signal. For dsDNA samples that are composed of mostly short strands, the reagent may still be used, but one should use a dsDNA standard that is of comparable length as the sample.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Nucleic Acid Quantification Support Center.
The Qubit Fluorometer contains highly optimized algorithms that calculate the concentration of the sample using either the Qubit assays or the Quant-iT DNA assays. The Quant-iT PicoGreen DNA assay may be adapted to the Qubit Fluorometer using the MyQubit firmware. The performance of all of these assays is similar.
The Quant-iT PicoGreen DNA assay is the most established assay and the most general-purpose (http://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/PicoGreen-dsDNA-protocol.pdf). It requires the dilution of the standard DNA and buffer but can be adapted for use with either cuvettes, microplates, or the NanoDrop 3300.
The Quant-iT DNA assays provide a ready-to-use buffer and pre-diluted standard DNA for analyzing a large number of samples (>20 samples) using a 96-well microplate with no further adaptation.
The Qubit assays (https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/industrial/spectroscopy-elemental-isotope-analysis/molecular-spectroscopy/fluorometers/qubit/qubit-assays/myqubit.html) are intended for low throughput (<20 samples), and are only used on the Qubit Fluorometer.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Nucleic Acid Quantification Support Center.
Yes, you can, for Qubit instruments developed after the original Qubit (1.0) Fluorometer. See MyQubit assay instructions here (http://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/laboratory-instruments/fluorometers/qubit/qubit-assays/myqubit.html.html).
Generally, the cleaner the sample the better. Some salts, proteins, and detergents are tolerated in the assays; see the specific assay protocol for which ones and at what concentrations.
The accuracy and sensitivity of the Qubit quantitation assays are the same as that of a microplate reader. This was a requirement during product development. The detection limits for each Qubit kit can be found on the corresponding product manual, which can be found by searching our website by keyword or catalog number.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Nucleic Acid Quantification Support Center.
No. The Qubit DNA and RNA kits only quantify the amount of either DNA or RNA in the sample. The Qubit fluorometer cannot take absorbance readings to provide a A260/A280 ratio or detect protein in nucleic acid samples. This can be done with the NanoDrop instrument. If your sample contains protein or other contaminants that can affect the assay, it should be further purified.
If your sample may contain both DNA and RNA, one may use either (or both) the DNA and RNA Qubit kits and compare with samples treated with either RNase or DNase to get an accurate determination of DNA or RNA, respectively.
All Quant-iT and Qubit kits are compatible with all fluorometers and microplate readers that have the appropriate light sources and filters. You won't have access to the algorithm in the Qubit fluorometer for generating the standard curve provided by the instrument, instead, you must make a few dilutions of the highest standard DNA or RNA (Standard #2) in the Qubit kits to generate a standard curve with multiple data points.
No, we do not recommend this. Some of the dyes in the original Quant-iT kits (those NOT listed as “for use with the Qubit fluorometer”) are not compatible with the Qubit Fluorometer. In addition, the new Quant-iT kits (labeled as “for use with the Qubit Fluorometer”) have standards formulated to be compatible with the Qubit fluorometer internal algorithms for the respective assays. The Qubit Fluorometer-compatible kits are also less expensive per assay if you are processing fewer than 20 samples at a time.
We do not have data regarding the compatibility of the Quant-iT Protein Assay Kit with RIPA or NP-40 and therefore cannot recommend using them together.
Though the Quant-iT Protein Assay Kit is indicated for high-throughput application, it is completely separate from the Qubit Protein and Protein Broad Range Assay Kits, not another version of them.
No, the Quant-it and Qubit reagents use different dyes and therefore are not interchangeable.
You can test the tolerance of the assay for your specific buffer formulation. For in-house generated compatibility information, substances were considered compatible at the indicated concentration in the Standard Test Tube Protocol (found in the manual for each protein assay) if the error in protein concentration estimation caused by the presence of the substance was less than or equal to 10%. The substances were tested using WR prepared immediately before each experiment. Blank-corrected 562nm absorbance measurements (for a 1000µg/mL BSA standard + substance) were compared to the net 562nm measurements of the same standard prepared in 0.9% saline.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
It is possible to have a substance additive affect such that even though a single component is present at a concentration below its listed compatibility, a sample buffer containing a combination of substances could interfere with the assay. You should take steps to eliminate or minimize the effects of the interfering substance(s) by diluting or removing the substance.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Refer to the information in the product-specific instruction booklet or our Tech Tip: Protein Quantitation Assay Compatibility Table (https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/Application-Notes/TR0068-Protein-assay-compatibility.pdf).
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Often, an alternative wavelength can be used, although the slope of the standard curve and the overall assay sensitivity will most likely be reduced. Our Tech Tip (https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/brochures/TR0025-Protein-assay-spectra.pdf) offers additional information on determining acceptable wavelengths for measuring protein assays.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
The lowest protein size limit for these reagents has not been determined, although proteins as small as 6000 Da have been accurately quantitated. Quantitation accuracy of small peptides would likely be variable and dependent on the composition of the peptide. We would recommend using the CBQCA Protein Quantitation Kit for quantitation of small peptides. For quantitating peptide digest mixtures for mass spectrometry applications, we recommend using the Quantitative Colorimetric Peptide Assay (Cat. No. 23275) or Quantitative Fluorometric Peptide Assay (Cat. No. 23290).
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
We do not recommend that you use the Quant-iT Protein Reagent or Qubit Protein Reagent to quantify proteins in the presence of any detergents, surfactants, lipids or other chemicals that can either displace the dye from a hydrophobic domain, disrupt lipid structure, or add a lipophilic/hydrophobic componentto the solution. The dye is environmentally sensitive; when it binds to hydrophobic pockets/domains, inserts into liposome lipid layers, or is dissolved in organic solvents, its fluorescence output increases relative to its fluorescence in aqueous solutions, potentially providing a higher background. Of course, this assumes that the liposome is not composed of anything that can quench fluorescence.
You may use the dye to quantitate purified protein and possibly a pure liposome sample (assuming that the solution the dye is dispersed in does not disrupt liposome structure), but it would be exceedingly difficult to quantify either as a mixed population.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Yes, the Quant-iT Protein Assay Kit (https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/Quant_iT_Protein_Assay_UG.pdf) has directions for performing this application.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
All the above assay kits come with either concentrated assay reagent and dilution buffer or a pre-diluted quantitation reagent and protein standards. The EZQ Protein Quantitation Kit also comes with a specially-designed 96-well microplate and filter paper that fits inside this microplate.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Several factors affect protein assay accuracy and precision:
Replicates: The only way to evaluate the extent of random error is to include replicates of each standard and test sample. Because all test samples are evaluated by comparison to the standard curve, it is especially important to run the standards in at least triplicate. The standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) can then be calculated, providing a degree of confidence in your pipetting precision. If replicates are used, curve-fitting is done with the average values (minus obvious outliers).
Blank correction: It is common practice to subtract the absorbance of the zero assay standard(s) from the all other sample absorbance values. However, if replicate zero-assay standards will be used to calculate error statistics, then another independent value may be required for blank-correction. If the standards were prepared in a buffer to match that of the test samples, and this buffer contains components that may interfere with the assay chemistry, it is informative to blank the absorbances with a "water reference" (i.e., a zero-protein, water sample). Differences between the water reference and zero standard sample are then indicative of buffer effects.
Standard curve slope: The standard curve slope is directly related to assay accuracy and sensitivity. All else being equal, the steepest part of the curve is the most reliable. For most protein assays, the standard curve is steepest (i.e., has the greatest positive slope) in the bottom half of the assay range. In fact, the upper limit of an assay range is determined by the point at which the slope approaches zero; the line there is so flat that even a tiny difference in measured absorbance translates to a large difference in calculated concentration.
Measurement wavelength: The measurement wavelengths that are recommended for each protein assay method are optimal because they yield standard curves with maximal slope. This usually, but not always, corresponds to the absorbance maximum. (In certain circumstances, other considerations are also important in choosing the best possible measurement wavelength, such as avoiding interference from sample components that absorb at similar wavelengths). In fact, for most protein assays, depending on the precision required, acceptable results can be obtained using any measurement wavelengths within a certain range.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
One situation in which the dilution factor is important to consider is when the original sample has been pre-diluted relative to the standard sample. Suppose the original protein sample is actually known to be approximately 5 mg/mL. This is too concentrated to be assayed by the Pierce Bradford Plus Protein Assay Kit, for example, whose assay range in the standard microplate protocol is 100-1500 µg/mL. However, you could dilute it 5-fold in buffer (i.e., 1 part sample plus 4 parts buffer) and then use that diluted sample as the test sample in the protein assay. If the test sample produces the same absorbance as the 1000 µg/mL standard sample, then you can conclude that the test (5-fold diluted) sample is 1000 µg/mL, and therefore the original (undiluted) sample is 5 x 1000 µg/mL = 5000 µg/mL = 5 mg/mL.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
No. It is neither necessary nor helpful to know the protein concentration as it exists when the samples are diluted in assay reagent. The protein concentration when diluted by assay reagent is almost certainly not the value of interest; instead, one wants to know the protein concentration of the original test sample.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
No. Contrary to what many people assume, it is neither necessary nor even helpful to know the actual amount (e.g., micrograms) of protein applied to each well or cuvette of the assay. The amount of protein per well is almost certainly not the value of interest; instead, one usually wants to know the protein concentration of the original test sample.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Enter the concentration values for the standards in Column A and their corresponding absorbance data in Column B. Highlight both columns and from the Insert menu select Chart and XY (Scatter). Click on the resulting graph and select Add Trendline from the Chart menu. While viewing the graph next to the open Format Trendline window, choose Polynomial and set the Order to 2, 3 or 4 until the best-fit appears. Check the box near the bottom called Display Equation on Chart; then close the Format Trendline window. Use the resulting equation to determine protein concentration (y) of an unknown sample by inserting the sample’s absorbance value (x).
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Most modern plate readers and spectrophotometers have associated software that automatically plots a linear or curvilinear regression line through the standard points, interpolates the test samples on that regression line, and reports the calculated value. However, there are different methods for making the calculations “by hand”. You can find a detailed explanation and example in our Tech Tip.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
With most protein assays, sample protein concentrations are determined by comparing their assay responses to that of a dilution-series of standards whose concentrations are known. The responses of the standards are used to plot or calculate a standard curve. Absorbance values of unknown samples are then interpolated onto the plot or formula for the standard curve to determine their concentrations. The most accurate results are possible only when unknown and standard samples are treated identically. This includes assaying them at the same time and in the same buffer conditions, if possible. Because different pipetting steps are involved, replicates are necessary if you wish to calculate statistics (e.g., standard deviation, coefficient of variation) to account for random error. It is imperative to run a new standard curve for each set of samples to be tested
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Simply multiply the calculated concentration of the diluted sample by the dilution factor. For example: A protein sample is known to be approximately 5 mg/mL. This is too concentrated to be assayed by the Pierce Bradford Plus Protein Assay Kit, whose assay range in the standard microplate protocol is 100-1500 µg/mL. However, you could dilute it 5-fold in buffer (i.e., 1 part sample plus 4 parts buffer) and then use that diluted sample as the test sample in the protein assay. If the test sample produces the same absorbance as the 1000 µg/mL standard sample, then you can conclude that the test (5-fold diluted) sample is 1000 µg/mL, and therefore the original (undiluted) sample is 5 × 1000 µg/mL = 5000 µg/mL = 5 mg/mL.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
The unit of measure used to express the standards is by definition the same unit of measure associated with the calculated value for the unknown sample (i.e., final results for unknown samples will be expressed in the same unit of measure as was used for the standards). For example, if the standard concentrations are expressed as micrograms per milliliter, then the concentrations for the unknown samples, which are determined by comparison to the standard curve, are also expressed as micrograms per milliliter.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Protein standards should preferably be diluted using the same diluent as the sample(s). Sample assay responses are directly comparable to each other if they are processed in exactly the same manner. Variance in protein quantity is the only possible cause for differences in final absorbance (color intensity) if samples are dissolved in the same buffer and the same stock solution of assay reagent is used for all samples.
However, if only a “rough” estimate of protein concentration is needed, a blank-only correction can be used. In this case, a blank is prepared in the diluent of the sample to correct for its raw absorbance. The concentration of the sample is then determined from a standard curve obtained from a series of dilutions of the protein of known concentration prepared in water or saline solution.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Protein concentrations are generally determined and reported with reference to standards of a common protein, such as bovine serum albumin (BSA). If precise quantitation of an unknown protein is required, it is advisable to select a protein standard that is similar in quality to the unknown; for example, a bovine gamma globulin (BGG) standard may be used when assaying immunoglobulin samples.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Because proteins differ in their amino acid compositions, each one responds somewhat differently in each type of protein assay. Therefore, the best choice for a reference standard is a purified, known concentration of the most abundant protein in the samples. This is usually not possible to achieve, and it is seldom convenient or necessary. If a highly purified version of the protein of interest is not available or it is too expensive to use as the standard, the alternative is to choose a protein that will produce a very similar color response curve in the selected protein assay method and is readily available to any laboratory at any time. Generally, bovine serum albumin (BSA) works well as a protein standard because it is widely available in high purity and relatively inexpensive. Alternatively, bovine gamma globulin (BGG) is a good standard when determining the concentration of antibodies because BGG produces a color response curve that is very similar to that of immunoglobulin G (IgG).
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Pierce Bradford Protein Assay Kit and Pierce Bradford Plus Protein Assay Kit are variations on the use of Coomassie G-250 dye as a colorimetric reagent for the detection and quantitation of total protein first reported by Bradford in 1976. The Thermo Scientific 660 nm Protein Assay is a dye-based reagent that offers the same convenience as Coomassie-based assays while overcoming several of their disadvantages. In particular, the 660 nm Assay is compatible with most detergents and produces a more linear response curve (the detailed assay chemistry is proprietary). Our fluorometric protein assays are also based on dye binding chemistries.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Each protein in a sample responds uniquely in a given protein assay, and this protein-to-protein variation is observed as differences in the amount of color (absorbance) obtained when the same mass of various proteins is assayed concurrently by the same method. These differences in color response relate to differences in amino acid sequence, isoelectric point (pI), secondary structure, and the presence of certain side chains or prosthetic groups.
Depending on the sample type and purpose for performing an assay, protein-to-protein variation is an important consideration in selecting a protein assay method and in selecting an appropriate assay standard (e.g., BSA vs. BGG). Protein assay methods based on similar chemistry have similar protein-to-protein variation.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Before the sample is analyzed, it must be solubilized in a buffered aqueous solution. Depending on the source material and the procedures involved before performing the protein assay, the sample will likely contain a variety of non-protein components. Awareness of these components is critical for choosing an appropriate assay method and evaluating the cause of anomalous results. Every type of protein assay is adversely affected by substances of one sort or another. Components of a protein solution are considered interfering substances in a protein assay if they artificially suppress the response, enhance the response, or cause elevated background by an arbitrarily chosen degree (e.g., 10% compared to control). Additional components can include reducing agents, chelators, crowding agents, and protease inhibitors.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
There are several criteria that should be considered, including compatibility with the sample type and components, assay range and required sample volume, protein-to-protein uniformity, speed and convenience for the number of samples to be tested, and the availability of spectrophotometer or plate reader necessary to measure the color produced (absorbance) by the assay.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Unfortunately, no protein assay method exists that is either perfectly specific to proteins (i.e., not affected by any nonprotein components) or uniformly sensitive to all protein types (i.e., not affected by differences in protein composition). Therefore, successful use of protein assays involves selecting the method that is most compatible with the samples to be analyzed, choosing an appropriate assay standard, and understanding and controlling the particular assumptions and limitations that remain. The objective is to select a method that requires the least manipulation or pre-treatment of the samples to accommodate substances that interfere with the assay. Each method has its particular advantages and disadvantages. Because no one reagent can be considered the ideal or best protein assay method for all circumstances, most researchers have more than one type of protein assay available in their laboratories.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
Unfortunately, no protein assay method exists that isn’t affected by any non-protein component or uniformly sensitive to all protein types. One must select an appropriate assay method based on compatibility with the sample type or one that requires the least manipulation of the sample to accommodate the assay. Most researchers will have more than one type of assay available in their laboratories.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
We offer several types of protein assays including the: BCA Assay, BCA-RAC (Reducing Agent Compatible) Assay, Micro BCA Assay, 660 nm Protein Assay, Pierce Bradford Plus Protein Assay Kit, Pierce Bradford Protein Assay Kit, Modified Lowry Assay, colorimetric and fluorometric Peptide Assays, CBQCA kit, EZQ kit, Quant-iT kits, NanoOrange, and the Qubit kits.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.
We offer a Quant-iT Protein Assay Kit (Cat. No. Q33210), which is more sensitive than standard absorbance-based assays and can quantitate proteins from 0.25-5 µg. The signal is unaffected by many common contaminants, such as DTT, beta-mercaptoethanol, amino acids, and DNA. Imidazole at a final concentration below 1.25 mM is acceptable. Above that concentration, the imidazole begins to interfere with the assay.
Please note, imidazole does absorb at 280 nm, and the absorbance varies with concentration. So to be perfectly accurate, each eluted fraction should be blanked against its elution buffer.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Purification and Isolation Support Center.