Vivid Colors™ pcDNA™6.2/C-YFP-DEST Vector - FAQs

View additional product information for Vivid Colors™ pcDNA™6.2/C-YFP-DEST Vector - FAQs (V35720)

65 product FAQs found

经β-半乳糖苷酶染色后,还能检测到细胞中的GFP荧光么?

我们推荐在进行β-半乳糖苷酶染色前观察GFP荧光。这是因为β-半乳糖苷酶染色过程会产生非常高的自发荧光,从而干扰GFP荧光的检测。 

你们推荐在荧光显微镜下使用何种滤光片组来检测EmGFP,YFP,CFP和BFP?

EmGFP,YFP,CFP和BFP均可通过标准的FITC滤光片组和参数设定来进行检测。不过,如需获得荧光信号的最佳检测结果,我们推荐用户针对每一种荧光蛋白的激发与发射波长范围来优化滤光片组。推荐的滤光片组如下所述:

EmGFP:Omega滤光片组XF100

YFP:Omega滤光片组XF1042
Chroma滤光片组41028

CFP:Omega滤光片组XF114
Chroma滤光片组31044

BFP:Omega滤光片组XF10
Chroma滤光片组31021

如需索取滤光片组的相关信息,请直接联系Omega Optical公司(www.omegafilters.com)或Chroma 技术公司(www.chroma.com)。

你们所提供的荧光蛋白(EmGFP,YFP,BFP,CFP和Cycle 3 GFP)的最强激发/发射波长分别是多少?

我们所提供荧光蛋白的激发/发射最大波长如下所述:

EmGFP:激发:487 nm;发射:509 nm
YFP:激发:514 nm;发射:527 nm
BFP:激发:308-383 nm;发射:440-447 nm
CFP:激发:452 nm;发射:505 nm
Cycle 3 GFP:第一激发波长:395 nm;第二激发波长:478 nm;发射:507 nm

你们所提供的荧光蛋白(EmGFP,YFP,CFP,BFP和Cycle 3 GFP)是否经过人源基因密码子优化?

是的,我们所提供的所有荧光蛋白(EmGFP,YFP,CFP,BFP和Cycle 3 GFP)均经过人源基因密码子优化以适合哺乳动物表达系统。 

Cycle 3 GFP与EmGFP和EGFP相比,使用效果如何?

EmGFP是EGFP的下一代变体,在哺乳动物体内表达效果更优。EmGFP和EGFP均可通过相同的滤光片组(FITC)和参数设定来实现可视化操作。在使用了推荐的滤光片组和参数设定的条件下,Cycle 3 GFP与EGFP或EmGFP一样明亮。不过,当使用FITC滤光片组及相关设定时,Cycle 3 GFP不如EmGFP或EGFP明亮。

EGFP的激发/发射最大波长:488 nm/507–509 nm
EmGFP的激发/发射最大波长:487 nm/509 nm
Cycle 3 GFP的激发/发射最大波长:395 nm (第一)和478 nm(第二)/507 nm

你们的Vivid Colors荧光蛋白载体与之前销售的Clontech BD Living Colors荧光蛋白相比,总体亮度如何?

除了进行了关键突变以增加Clontech荧光蛋白亮度之外,我们还进行了遗传增强元件改造,以提升荧光量子产率。平行对比结果显示Vivid Colors荧光蛋白表达载体的荧光强度至少与对应的Clontech BD Living Colors荧光蛋白表达载体相当(或更好)。 

你们推荐使用何种大肠杆菌感受态来扩增Gateway兼容的哺乳动物目的载体?

我们推荐使用One Shot ccdB Survival 2 T1^R 感受态细胞,货号A10460。该菌株能够耐受ccdB基因的毒性效应。

注意: 请勿使用常规的大肠杆菌克隆株 - 包括TOP10或DH5α - 来进行扩增和培养,因为这些菌株均对ccdB的效应很敏感。

哺乳动物表达中保守的Kozak序列是做什么用的?在将目的基因克隆至你们所提供的哺乳动物表达载体时,我是否需要包含一个Kozak序列?

保守的Kozak序列为A/G NNATGG,其中的ATG表示起始密码子。ATG周围的核苷酸点突变会影响翻译效率。尽管我们通常情况下都推荐加入一段Kozak保守序列,不过这一操作的必要性还是基于具体的目的基因,一般只需ATG就足以高效地启始翻译过程。最佳的建议是保持cDNA中天然起始位点,除非确定这一位点的功能性不理想。如果从表达的角度来考虑,推荐构建并测试两种载体,一个具有天然的起始位点,另一个具有保守的Kozak序列。通常情况下,所有具有N-融合表达的表达载体都已经包含了一个翻译起始位点。

我需要在克隆目的基因时在其中包含一个核糖体结合位点(RBS)或Kozak序列吗?

ATG通常对于高效的翻译启始是足够的,尽管翻译效率要视目的基因而定。最佳的建议应是保持cDNA中天然起始位点,除非确定这一位点的功能性不理想。如果从表达的角度来考虑,推荐构建并测试两种载体,一个具有天然的起始位点,另一个具有保守的Kozak序列。通常情况下,所有N-端融合型表达载体都已包含了一个RBS或翻译起始位点。

使用BP克隆可以将多大的PCR片段和pDONR载体重组?对于TOPO-接头的入门载体也是一样吗?

理论上,pDONR载体在BP反应时对插入片段没有大小的限制。我们自己测试过的最大片段是12 kb。TOPO载体对插入片段大小更敏感一些,要获得较高的克隆效率其插入片段长度的上限是3-5 kb。

如何纯化attB-PCR产物?

在得到attB-PCR产物之后,我们建议对产物进行纯化以去除PCR缓冲液,残留的dNTP,attB引物,以及attB引物二聚体。引物和引物二聚体在BP反应中会高效的与供体载体重组,因而会增加转化E. coli时的背景,而残留的PCR缓冲液可能会抑制BP反应。使用酚/氯仿抽提,加醋酸铵和乙醇或异丙醇沉淀的标准PCR产物纯化方案不适合对attB-PCR产物进行纯化,因为这些实验方案通常仅能去除小于100 bp的杂质,而在去除较大的引物二聚体时效果不佳。我们推荐一种PEG纯化方案(请参见使用Clonase II的Gateway技术手册第17页)。如果使用上述实验方案您的attB-PCR产物仍然不够纯,您可以进一步对其进行凝胶纯化。我们推荐使用Purelink Quick 凝胶纯化试剂盒。

我试图扩增自己的Gateway目的载体,但是没有得到任何克隆。我应该怎么办?

请检查您所用的菌株的基因型。我们的Gateway目的载体通常含有一个ccdB基因元件,该元件如果不被破坏,则E. Coli生长将受到抑制。因此,未进行克隆的载体应该在ccdB survival菌株如我们的ccdB Survival 2 T1R感受态细胞中扩增。

Shine-Dalgarno和Kozak序列有何区别?

原核生物mRNA含有Shine-Dalgarno序列,也称为核糖体结合位点(RBS),它是由AUG起始密码子5’端的多嘌呤序列AGGAGG组成。该序列与16S rRNA 3’端的互补,有助于mRNA有效结合到核糖体上。同理,真核生物(特别是哺乳动物)mRNA也含有完成有效翻译所需的重要序列信息。然而,Kozak序列不是真正的核糖体结合位点,而是一种翻译起始增强子。Kozak共有序列是ACCAUGG,其中AUG是起始密码子。-3位的嘌呤(A/G)具有重要作用;若-3位是一个嘧啶(C/T),翻译过程会对-1、-2和+4位的改变更敏感。当-3位从嘌呤变为嘧啶时,可使表达水平降低多达95%。+4位对表达水平的影响相对较小,可以使表达水平降低约50%。

注:果蝇的最佳Kozak序列稍有不同,酵母完全不遵循这些规则。见下列参考文献:
•Foreign Gene Expression in Yeast: a Review. Yeast, vol. 8, p. 423-488 (1992).
•Caveneer, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 1353-1361 (1987).

Gateway克隆和表达需满足的先决条件是什么?

目的基因必须两端带有合适的att位点,或者是入门克隆中的attL (100 bp)位点,或者是PCR产物中的 attB (25 bp)位点。对于入门克隆而言,所有位于attL位点之间的部分都将被转移到含有attR位点的Gateway目的载体中,而两端带有attB位点的PCR产物需被转移到一个含有attP位点的供体载体,例如pDONR221。

翻译起始位点的位置,终止子,或者用于表达的融合标签必须在最开始的克隆设计中考虑到。例如,如果您的目的载体包含一个N末端标记而非C末端标记,则该载体应当已经带有合适的翻译起始位点,但是终止子应当被包含在插入片段当中。

用于Gateway克隆反应的DNA的纯度有要求吗?

小抽(碱裂解)纯化的DNA即适用在Gateway克隆反应中。重要的一点是要将RNA污染去除干净以便得到精确的定量。推荐使用通过我们的S.N.A.P. 核酸纯化试剂盒,ChargeSwitch试剂盒,或PureLink试剂盒纯化的质粒DNA。

Gateway克隆插入片段的长度有什么限制吗?

理论上没有片段大小限制。长度在100 bp到11 kb之间的PCR产物可以被直接克隆到pDONR Gateway载体中。其它DNA片段如带有att位点的150 kb DNA片段可以成功和一个Gateway兼容载体发生重组。对于大的插入片段,推荐进行过夜孵育反应。

Can GFP fluorescence be detected in cells that have been stained for beta-galactosidase?

We recommend looking for GFP fluorescence before staining for beta-galactosidase. This is because the beta-galactosidase staining process produces a very high autofluorescence that will interfere with detection of GFP fluorescence.

What are the recommended filter sets for detection of EmGFP, YFP, CFP, and BFP by fluorescence microscopy?

EmGFP, YFP, CFP, and BFP can be detected using standard FITC filter sets and settings. However, for optimal detection of the fluorescence signal, filter sets optimized for detection within the excitation and emission ranges for each fluorescent protein are recommended. The recommended filter sets are as follows: EmGFP: Omega filter set XF100 YFP: Omega filter set XF1042 Chroma filter set 41028 CFP: Omega filter set XF114 Chroma filter set 31044 BFP: Omega filter set XF10 Chroma filter set 31021 For information on obtaining filter sets, please contact Omega Optical, Inc. (www.omegafilters.com) or Chroma Technology Corporation (www.chroma.com) directly.

What are the excitation and emission maxima for your fluorescent proteins (EmGFP, YFP, BFP, CFP, and Cycle 3 GFP)?

Excitation and emission maxima for our fluorescent proteins are as follows:
- EmGFP: Excitation: 487 nm; Emission: 509 nm
- YFP: Excitation: 514 nm; Emission: 527 nm
- BFP: Excitation: 308-383 nm; Emission: 440-447 nm
- CFP: Excitation: 452 nm; Emission: 505 nm
- Cycle 3 GFP: Primary excitation: 395 nm; Secondary Excitation: 478 nm; Emission: 507 nm

Are the fluorescent proteins you offer (EmGFP, YFP, CFP, BFP, and Cycle 3 GFP) humanized?

Yes, all of the fluorescent proteins offered by us (EmGFP, YFP, CFP, BFP, and Cycle 3 GFP) have been humanized for optimal mammalian expression.

How does Cycle 3 GFP compare with EmGFP and EGFP?

EmGFP is the next-generation variant of EGFP, and it has been further optimized for mammalian expression. Both EmGFP and EGFP can be visualized using the same filter sets (FITC) and settings. When used with the recommended filter sets and settings, Cycle 3 GFP is as bright as EGFP or EmGFP. However, when used with FITC filter sets and settings, Cycle 3 GFP is not as bright as EmGFP or EGFP.

- Excitation/emission maxima for EGFP: 488 nm/507-509 nm
- Excitation/emission maxima for EmGFP: 487 nm/509 nm
- Excitation/emission maxima for Cycle 3 GFP: 395 nm (primary) and 478 nm (secondary)/507 nm

How do your Vivid Colors fluorescent protein vectors compare to the previously sold Clontech BD Living Colors fluorescent protein vectors in terms of overall brightness?

In addition to the key mutations that enhanced the brightness of the Clontech fluorescent proteins, we have added further genetic enhancements to the fluorescent proteins to increase the quantum yield. Side-by-side comparisons have shown the fluorescence intensity of our Vivid Colors fluorescent protein expression vectors to be at least equivalent (or better than) the comparable Clontech BD Living Colors fluorescent protein expression vectors. 

Which competent E. coli do you recommend using for propagation of my Gateway-adapted mammalian Destination vector?

We recommend using One Shot ccdB Survival 2 T1R Competent Cells, Cat. No. A10460. This strain is resistant to the toxic effects of the ccdB gene. Note: Do not use general E. coli cloning strains, including TOP10 or DH5alpha, for propagation and maintenance, as these strains are sensitive to ccdB effects.

Do I need to include a consensus Kozak sequence when I clone my gene of interest into one of your mammalian expression vectors?

The consensus Kozak sequence is A/G NNATGG, where the ATG indicates the initiation codon. Point mutations in the nucleotides surrounding the ATG have been shown to modulate translation efficiency. Although we make a general recommendation to include a Kozak consensus sequence, the necessity depends on the gene of interest and often, the ATG alone may be sufficient for efficient translation initiation. The best advice is to keep the native start site found in the cDNA unless one knows that it is not functionally ideal. If concerned about expression, it is advisable to test two constructs, one with the native start site and the other with a consensus Kozak. In general, all expression vectors that have an N-terminal fusion will already have an initiation site for translation.

Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Expression Support Center.

Do I need to include a ribosomal binding site (RBS/Shine Dalgarno sequence) or Kozak sequence when I clone my gene of interest?

ATG is often sufficient for efficient translation initiation although it depends upon the gene of interest. The best advice is to keep the native start site found in the cDNA unless one knows that it is not functionally ideal. If concerned about expression, it is advisable to test two constructs, one with the native start site and the other with a Shine Dalgarno sequence/RBS or consensus Kozak sequence (ACCAUGG), as the case may be. In general, all expression vectors that have an N-terminal fusion will already have a RBS or initiation site for translation.

Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Expression Support Center.

How large of a PCR product can I recombine with a pDONR vector via BP cloning? Does the same apply for TOPO-adapted Entry vectors?

There is no theoretical limit to insert size for a BP reaction with a pDONR vector. Maximum size tested in-house is 12 kb. TOPO vectors are more sensitive to insert size and 3-5 kb is the upper limit for decent cloning efficiency.

How should I clean up my attB-PCR product?

After generating your attB-PCR product, we recommend purifying it to remove PCR buffer, unincorporated dNTPs, attB primers, and any attB primer-dimers. Primers and primer-dimers can recombine efficiently with the Donor vector in the BP reaction and may increase background after transformation into E. coli, whereas leftover PCR buffer may inhibit the BP reaction. Standard PCR product purification protocols using phenol/chloroform extraction followed by ammonium acetate and ethanol or isopropanol precipitation are not recommended for purification of the attB-PCR product as these protocols generally have exclusion limits of less than 100 bp and do not efficiently remove large primer-dimer products. We recommend a PEG purification protocol (see page 17 of the Gateway Technology with Clonase II manual). If you use the above protocol and your attB-PCR product is still not suitably purified, you may further gel-purify the product. We recommend using the PureLink Quick Gel Extraction kit.

I'm trying to propagate my Gateway destination vector and am not seeing any colonies. What should I do?

Check the genotype of the cell strain you are using. Our Gateway destination vectors typically contain a ccdB cassette, which, if uninterrupted, will inhibit E. coli growth. Therefore, un-cloned vectors should be propagated in a ccdB survival cell strain, such as our ccdB Survival 2 T1R competent cells.

What is the difference between LR Clonase II and LR Clonase II Plus?

LR Clonase II Plus contains an optimized formulation of recombination enzymes for use in MultiSite Gateway LR reactions. LR Clonase and LR Clonase II enzyme mixes are not recommended for MultiSite Gateway LR recombination reactions, but LR Clonase II Plus is compatible with both multi-site and single-site LR recombination reactions.

The nomenclature for your Vivid Colors fluorescent protein-tagged vectors seems to be different from Clontech's nomenclature. Why is this?

Clontech named their BD Living Colors-fusion vectors with reference to the location of the ORF in the fusion construct. For example, to fuse an ORF with a C-terminal fluorescent protein tag, a Clontech N-series vector (N-terminal Fusion vector) was used. Our nomenclature is exactly the opposite. This was done to be consistent with the standardized nomenclature we have been using with our expression vector products for many years. For example, our Vivid Colors pcDNA6.2/C-EmGFP-DEST is a vector suitable for Gateway cloning an ORF upstream of an EmGFP-tag. Likewise, the Vivid Colors pcDNA6.2/N-YFP-DEST is a vector suitable for Gateway cloning an ORF downstream of a YFP-tag. So, our Vivid Colors-fusion vectors are named with specific reference to the location of the fluorescent protein tag in the fusion construct.

What is the purpose of the Proteinase K step following a Gateway LR Recombination reaction, and is it critical to the results?

When the LR reaction is complete, the reaction is stopped with Proteinase K and transformed into E. coli resulting in an expression clone containing a gene of interest. A typical LR reaction followed by Proteinase K treatment yields about 35,000 to 150,000 colonies per 20ul reaction. Without the Proteinase K treatment, up to a 10 fold reduction in the number of colonies can be observed. Despite this reduction, there are often still enough colonies containing the gene of interest to proceed with your experiment, so the Proteinase K step can be left out after the LR reaction is complete if necessary.

Can I go directly from a pENTR/D-TOPO reaction into an LR Clonase Reaction without first purifying the DNA?

In most cases, there will not be enough pENTR vector DNA present to go directly from TOPO cloning into an LR reaction. You need between 100-300 ng of pENTR vector for an efficient LR reaction, and miniprep of a colony from the TOPO transformation is necessary to obtain that much DNA. However, if you want to try it, here are some recommendations for attempting to go straight into LR reactions from the TOPO reaction using pENTR/D, or SD TOPO, or pCR8/GW/TOPO vectors:

1. Heat inactivate the topoisomerase after the TOPO cloning reaction by incubating the reaction at 85 degrees C for 15 minutes.
2. Use the entire reaction (6 µL) in the LR clonase reaction. No purification steps are necessary.
3. Divide the completed LR reaction into 4 tubes and carry out transformations with each tube. You cannot transform entire 20 µL reaction in one transformation, and we have not tried ethanol precipitation and then a single transformation.

When attempting this protocol, we observed very low efficiencies (~10 colonies/plate). So just be aware that while technically possible, going directly into an LR reaction from a TOPO reaction is very inefficient and will result in a very low colony number, if any at all.

Can N-terminal or C-terminal tags be attached to a Gateway Entry clone?

To have an N-terminal tag, the gene of interest must be in the correct reading frame when using non-TOPO adapted Gateway entry vectors. All TOPO adapted Gateway Entry vectors will automatically put the insert into the correct reading frame, and to add the N-terminal tag you simply recombine with a destination vector that has N-terminal tag.

To attach a C-terminal tag to your gene of interest, the insert must lack its stop codon, and be in the correct reading frame for compatibility with our C-terminal tagged destination vectors. Again, TOPO adapted Gateway Entry vectors will automatically put the insert into the correct reading frame. If you do not want the C-terminal tag to be expressed, simply include a stop codon at the end of the insert that is in frame with the initial ATG.

Generally, you need to choose a destination vector before you design and clone your insert into the Entry vector. This will determine whether you need to include an initiating ATG or stop codon with your insert.

Can you tell me the difference between a Shine-Dalgarno sequence and a Kozak sequence?

Prokaryotic mRNAs contain a Shine-Dalgarno sequence, also known as a ribosome binding site (RBS), which is composed of the polypurine sequence AGGAGG located just 5’ of the AUG initiation codon. This sequence allows the message to bind efficiently to the ribosome due to its complementarity with the 3’-end of the 16S rRNA. Similarly, eukaryotic (and specifically mammalian) mRNA also contains sequence information important for efficient translation. However, this sequence, termed a Kozak sequence, is not a true ribosome binding site, but rather a translation initiation enhancer. The Kozak consensus sequence is ACCAUGG, where AUG is the initiation codon. A purine (A/G) in position -3 has a dominant effect; with a pyrimidine (C/T) in position -3, translation becomes more sensitive to changes in positions -1, -2, and +4. Expression levels can be reduced up to 95% when the -3 position is changed from a purine to pyrimidine. The +4 position has less influence on expression levels where approximately 50% reduction is seen. See the following references:

- Kozak, M. (1986) Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell 44, 283-292.
- Kozak, M. (1987) At least six nucleotides preceding the AUG initiator codon enhance translation in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 947-950.
- Kozak, M. (1987) An analysis of 5´-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 8125-8148.
- Kozak, M. (1989) The scanning model for translation: An update. J. Cell Biol. 108, 229-241.
- Kozak, M. (1990) Evaluation of the fidelity of initiation of translation in reticulocyte lysates from commercial sources. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 2828.

Note: The optimal Kozak sequence for Drosophila differs slightly, and yeast do not follow this rule at all. See the following references:

- Romanos, M.A., Scorer, C.A., Clare, J.J. (1992) Foreign gene expression in yeast: a review. Yeast 8, 423-488.
- Cavaneer, D.R. (1987) Comparison of the consensus sequence flanking translational start sites in Drosophila and vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 1353-1361.

Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Expression Support Center.

Can an attB-PCR product be cloned directly into an expression (Gateway Destination) vector?

No, not directly. The attB-PCR product must first be cloned, via a BP Clonase reaction, into a pDONR vector which creates an "Entry Clone" with attL sites. This clone can then be recombined, via an LR Clonase reaction, with a Destination vector containing attR sites. However, It is possible to perform both of these reactions in one step using the "One-Tube Protocol" described in the manual entitled "Gateway Technology with Clonase II".

Can Gateway technology be used to express two proteins from the same vector?

Yes, this can be done using the Multisite Gateway Technology. MultiSite Gateway Pro Technology enables you to efficiently and conveniently assemble multiple DNA fragments - including genes of interest, promoters, and IRES sequences - in the desired order and orientation into a Gateway Expression vector. Using specifically designed att sites for recombinational cloning, you can clone two, three, or four DNA fragments into any Gateway Destination vector containing attR1 and attR2 sites. The resulting expression clone is ready for downstream expression and analysis applications.

What is the efficiency of recombination in the Gateway system?

For the BP reaction, approximately 5-10% of the starting material is converted into product. For the LR reaction, approximately 30% of the starting material is converted into product.

Are there common restriction sites that can be used to excise a gene out of a Gateway plasmid?

The core region of the att sites contains the recognition sequence for the restriction enzyme BsrGI. Provided there are no BsrGI sites in the insert, this enzyme can be used to excise the full gene from most Gateway plasmids. The BsrGI recognition site is 5'-TGTACA and is found in both att sites flanking the insertion site.

If a different restriction site is desired, the appropriate sequence should be incorporated into your insert by PCR.

Do I have to synthesize new attB primers (29 base attB primer + my specific sequence primer) each time I want to make an attB PCR product, or do you have truncated attB primers that work together with adapter attB primers to get a complete attB sequence?

We do have an alternative method called the "attB Adapter PCR" Protocol in which you make your gene specific primer with only 12 additional attB bases and use attB universal adapter primers. This protocol allows for shorter primers to amplify attB-PCR products by utilizing four primers instead of the usual two in a PCR reaction. You can find the sequence of these primers in the protocol on page 45 of the "Gateway Technology with Clonase II" manual.

There is a protocol in which all 4 primers mentioned above are in a single PCR reaction. You can find this protocol at in the following article: Quest vol. 1, Issue 2, 2004. https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/references/newsletters-and-journals/quest-archive.reg.in.html. The best ratio of the first gene-specific and the second attB primers was 1:10.

Do you have recommended sequencing primers for pDONR201?

We do not offer pre-made primers, but we can recommend the following sequences that can be ordered as custom primers for sequencing of pDONR201:
Forward primer, proximal to attL1: 5'- TCGCGTTAACGCTAGCATGGATCTC
Reverse primer, proximal to attL2: 5'-GTAACATCAGAGATTTTGAGACAC

Can you please list some references for Gateway Cloning Technology?

1. Yeast two-hybrid protein-protein interaction studies Walhout AJ, Sordella R, Lu X, Hartley JL, Temple GF, Brasch MA, Thierry-Mieg N, Vidal M.

2. Protein Interaction Mapping in C. elegans Using Proteins Involved in Vulval Development. Science Jan 7th 2000; 287(5450), 116-122 Davy, A. et al.

3. A protein-protein interaction map of the Caenorhabditis elegans 26S proteosome. EMBO Reports (2001) 2 (9), p. 821-828. Walhout, A.J.M. and Vidal, M. (2001).

4. High-throughput Yeast Two-Hybrid Assays for Large-Scale Protein Interaction mapping. Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 24(3), pp.297-306

5. Large Scale Analysis of Protein Complexes Gavin, AC et al. Functional Organization of the Yeast Proteome by Systematic Analysis of Protein Complexes. Nature Jan 10th 2002, 415, p. 141-147.

6. Systematic subcellular localisation of proteins Simpson, J.C., Wellenreuther, R., Poustka, A., Pepperkok, R. and Wiemann, S.

7. Systematic subcellular localization of novel proteins identified by large-scale cDNA sequencing. EMBO Reports (2000) 1(3), pp. 287-292.

8. Protein-over expression and crystallography Evdokimov, A.G., Anderson, D.E., Routzahn, K.M. & Waugh, D.S.

9. Overproduction, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of YopM, an essential virulence factor extruded by the plague bacterium Yersinia pestis. Acta Crystallography (2000) D56, 1676-1679.

10. Evdokimov, et al. Structure of the N-terminal domain of Yersinia pestis YopH at 2.0 A resolution. Acta Crystallographica D57, 793-799 (2001).

11. Lao, G. et al. Overexpression of Trehalose Synthase and Accumulation of Intracellular Trehalose in 293H and 293FTetR:Hyg Cells. Cryobiology 43(2):106-113 (2001).

12. High-throughput cloning and expression Albertha J. M. Walhout, Gary F. Temple, Michael A. Brasch, James L. Hartley, Monique A. Lorson, Sander Van Den Huevel, and Marc Vidal.

13. Gateway Recombinational Cloning: Application to the Cloning of Large Numbers of Open Reading Frames or ORFeomes. Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 328, 575-592.

14. Wiemann, S. et.al., Toward a Catalog of Human Genes and Proteins: Sequencing and Analysis of 500 Novel Complete Protein Coding Human cDNAs, Genome Research (March 2001) Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp.422-435

15. Reviewed in NATURE: Free Access to cDNA provides impetus to gene function work. 15 march 2001, p. 289. Generating directional cDNA libraries using recombination

16. Osamu Ohara and Gary F. Temple. Directional cDNA library construction assisted by the in vitro recombination reaction. Nucleic Acids Research 2001, Vol. 29, no. 4. RNA interference (RNAi)

17. Varsha Wesley, S. et al. Construct design for efficient, effective and highthroughput gene silencing in plants. The Plant Journal 27(6), 581-590 (2001). Generation of retroviral constructs

18. Loftus S K et al. Generation of RCAS vectors useful for functional genomic analyses. DNA Res 31;8(5):221 (2001).

19. James L. Hartley, Gary F. Temple and Michael A. Brasch. DNA Cloning Using In Vitro Site-Specific Recombination. Genome Research (2000) 10(11), pp. 1788-1795.

20. Reboul et al. Open-reading frame sequence tags (OSTs) support the existence of at least 17,300 genes in C. elegans. Nature Genetics 27(3):332-226 (2001).

21. Kneidinger, B. et al. Identification of two GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose reductase synthesizing GDP-D-rhamnose in Aneurinibacillus thermoaerophilus L420-91T*. JBC 276(8) (2001).

What do attL1 and attL2 sites look like after recombination between attB and attP sites?

The attP1 sequence (pDONR) is:
AATAATGATT TTATTTTGAC TGATAGTGAC CTGTTCGTTG CAACAAATTG ATGAGCAATGCTTTTTTAT AATGCCAACT TTGTACAAAA AAGC[TGAACG AGAAACGTAA AATGATATAA ATATCAATAT ATTAAATTAG ATTTTGCATA AAAAACAGACTA CATAATACTG TAAAACACAA CATATCCAGT CACTATGAAT CAACTACTTA GATGGTATTA GTGACCTGTA]

The region within brackets is where the site is "cut" and replaced by the attB1-fragment sequence to make an attL1 site. The sequence GTACAAA is the overlap sequence present in all att1 sites and is always "cut" right before the first G.

The overlap sequence in attP2 sites is CTTGTAC and cut before C. This is attP2:
ACAGGTCACT AATACCATCT AAGTAGTTGA TTCATAGTGA CTGGATATGT TGTGTTTTAC AGTATTATGT AGTCTGTTTT TTATGCAAAA TCTAATTTAA TATATTGATA TTTATATCAT TTTACGTTTC TCGTTCAGCT TTCTTGTACA AAGTTGGCAT TATAAGAAAG CATTGCTTAT AATTTGTTG CAACGAACAG GTCACTATCA GTCAAAATAA AATCATTATT

So, attL1 (Entry Clone) should be:
A ATAATGATTT TATTTTGACT GATAGTGACC TGTTCGTTGC AACAAATTGA TGAGCAATGC TTTTTTATAA TGCCAACT TT G TAC AAA AAA GC[A GGC T]NN NNN

attL2 (Entry Clone) should be:
NNN N[AC C]CA GCT TT CTTGTACA AAGTTGGCAT TATAAGAAAG CATTGCTTAT CAATTTGTTG CAACGAACAG GTCACTATCA GTCAAAATAA AATCATTATT

The sequence in brackets comes from attB, and N is your gene-specific sequence.

Note: When creating an Entry Clone through the BP reaction and a PCR product, the vector backbone is not the same as Gateway Entry vectors. The backbone in the case of PCR BP cloning is pDONR201.

How large can PCR fragments be and still be cloned into a Gateway Entry vector?

There is no size restriction on the PCR fragments if they are cloned into a pDONR vector. The upper limit for efficient cloning into a TOPO adapted Gateway Entry vector is approximately 5 kb. A Gateway recombination reaction can occur between DNA fragments that are as large as 150 kb.

What is the influence of the attB sequence on protein function, solubility, folding, and expression?

Destination vectors that contain N-terminal fusion partners will express proteins that contain amino acids contributed from the attB1 site, which is 25 bases long. This means that in addition to any tag (6x His and/or antibody epitope tag), the N-terminus of an expressed protein will contain an additional 9 amino acids from the attB1 sequence - the typical amino acid sequence is Thr-Ser-Leu-Tyr-Lys-Lys-Ala-Gly-nnn, where nnn will depend on the codon sequence of the insert.

Effects on protein function: A researcher (Simpson et al. EMBO Reports 11(31):287-292, 2000) demonstrated that GFP fusions (N- terminal and C-terminal) localized to the proper intracellular compartment. The expression constructs were generated using Gateway cloning, so the recombinant protein contained the attB1 or attB2 amino acid sequence. The localization function of the cloned recombinant proteins was preserved.

Effects on expression: We have seen no effect of the attB sites on expression levels in E. coli, insect and mammalian cells. The gus gene was cloned into bacterial expression vectors (for native and N-terminal fusion protein expression) using standard cloning techniques and expressed in bacteria. Gus was also cloned into Gateway Destination vectors (for native and N-terminal fusion expression) and expressed. When protein expression is compared, there was no difference in the amount of protein produced. This demonstrates that for this particular case, the attB sites do not interfere with transcription or translation.

Effects on solubility: A researcher at the NCI has shown that Maltose Binding Protein fusions constructed with Gateway Cloning were soluble. The fusion proteins expressed had the attB amino acid sequence between the Maltose Binding Protein and the cloned protein. It is possible that some proteins containing the attB sequence could remain insoluble when expressed in E.coli.

Effects on folding: Two Hybrids screens show the same interacters identified with and without the attB sequence. Presumably correct protein folding would be required for protein-protein interactions to take place. It is possible that some proteins containing the attB sequence may not fold correctly.

Must PCR conditions be changed once the original PCR primers have attB sequence added to them?

Since the attB sequences are on the 5' end of oligos, they will not anneal to the target template in the first round of PCR. Sometimes the PCR product is more specific with the attB primers, probably due to the longer annealing sequence (all of attB plus gene specific sequence) after the first round of amplification. Generally there is no need to change PCR reaction conditions when primers have the additional attB sequence

Can PCR primers be tailed directly with attL sites for direct recombination into the destination vector?

No, this is not really feasible due to the fact that the attL sequence is approximately 100 bp, which is too long for efficient oligo synthesis. Our own maximum sequence length for ordering custom primers is 100 nucleotides. In contrast, the attB sequences are only 25 bp long, which is a very reasonable length for adding onto the 5' end of gene-specific PCR primers.

Where can I get Gateway vector sequences and maps?

Vector information can be found in the product manuals or directly on our web site by entering the catalog number of the product in the search box. The vector map, cloning site diagram, and sequence information will be linked to the product page.

From where does Gateway get its lambda nomenclature, and is it consistent with textbook nomenclature for lambda recombination?

The Gateway nomenclature is consistent with lambda nomenclature, but we use numbers to differentiate between modified versions of the att sites (attB1, attB2, attP1, attP2, and so on). We have introduced mutations in the att sites to provide specificity and directionality to the recombination reaction. For example, attB1 will only recombine with attP1 and not with attP2.

What is the first step in an experiment with the Gateway system?

The first step is to create an Entry clone for your gene of interest. We have 3 options to do this: The first is by BP recombination reaction using the PCR Cloning System with Gateway Technology. This is recommended for cloning large (>5 kb) PCR products. We also have Gateway compatible TOPO Cloning vectors such as pCR8/GW/TOPO and pENTR/D-TOPO. The final option is to use restriction enzymes to clone into a pENTR Dual Selection vector.

What are the prerequisites for Gateway cloning and expression?

The gene of interest must be flanked by the appropriate att sites, either attL (100 bp) in an Entry clone or attB (25 bp) in a PCR product. For Entry clones, everything between the attL sites will be shuttled into the Gateway destination vector containing attR sites, and a PCR product flanked by attB sites must be shuttled into an attP-containing donor vector such as pDONR221.

The location of translation initiation sites, stop codons, or fusion tags for expression must be considered in your initial cloning design. For example, if your destination vector contains an N-terminal tag but does not have a C-terminal tag, the vector should already contain the appropriate translation start site but the stop codon should be included in your insert.

Will increasing the Gateway cloning reaction time improve recombination efficiency?

Yes, increasing the incubation time from 1 hour to 4 hours will generally increase colony numbers 2-3 fold. An overnight incubation at room temperature will typically increase colony yield by 5-10 fold.

How many times can I thaw BP Clonase II and LR Clonase II?

BP Clonase II and LR Clonase II can be freeze/thawed at least 10 times without significant loss of activity. However, you may still want to aliquot the enzymes to keep freeze/thaw variability to a minimum.

These enzymes are more stable than the original BP and LR Clonase and can be stored at -20 degrees C for 6 months.

How clean must my DNA be to use in a Gateway cloning reaction?

Mini-prep (alkaline lysis) DNA preparations work well in Gateway cloning reactions. It is important that the procedure remove contaminating RNA for accurate quantification. Plasmid DNA purified with our S.N.A.P. nucleic acid purification kits, ChargeSwitch kits, or PureLink kits are recommended.

How would you incorporate a leader sequence for secretion into an entry vector?

A simple way to express a protein with a leader sequence is to have the leader sequence encoded in the destination vector. The other option is to have the leader sequence subcloned into the entry vector using restriction enzymes, or incorporate the leader sequence into the forward PCR primer when cloning a PCR product into the entry vector. Please see Esposito et al. (2005), Prot. Exp. & Purif. 40, 424-428 for an example of how a partial leader sequence for secretion was incorporated into an entry vector.

Where is the ATG relative to the 5' attB site in a Gateway expression clone?

This depends on whether you are expressing a fusion or a native protein in the Gateway destination vector. For an N-terminal fusion protein the ATG will be given by the destination vector and it will be upstream of the attB1 site. For a C-terminal fusion protein or a native protein, the ATG should be provided by your gene of interest, and it will be downstream of the attB1 site.

Are the Gateway attB1 and attB2 sites the same as the attB site used for recombination into E. coli by bacteriophage lambda?

The Gateway attB sites are derived from the bacteriophage lambda site-specific recombination, but are modified to remove stop codons and reduce secondary structure. The core regions have also been modified for specificity (i.e., attB1 will recombine with attP1 but not with attP2).

Will Gateway att sites affect the expression of my protein?

Expression experiments have shown that the extra amino acids contributed by the attB site to a fusion protein will most likely have no effect on protein expression levels or stability. In addition, they do not appear to have any effect on two-hybrid interactions in yeast. However, as is true with the addition of any extra sequences that result from tags, the possible effects will be protein-dependent.

Can the attB primers anneal in a non-specific manner?

No, attB primers are highly specific under standard PCR conditions. We have amplified from RNA (RT-PCR), cDNA libraries, genomic DNA, and plasmid templates without any specificity problems.

What is the smallest fragment that can be used in a Gateway reaction?

The smallest size we have recombined is a 70 bp piece of DNA located between the att sites. Very small pieces are difficult to clone since they negatively influence the topology of the recombination reaction.

Are there any limitations on the insert length in Gateway cloning?

There is no theoretical size limitation. PCR products between 100 bp and 11 Kb have been readily cloned into a pDONR Gateway vector. Other DNA pieces as large as 150 kb with att sites will successfully recombine with a Gateway-compatible vector. Overnight incubation is recommended for large inserts.

What primer purity should be used for adding attB sites to my PCR product?

Standard desalted purity is generally sufficient for creating attB primers. We examined HPLC-purified oligos for Gateway cloning (about 50 bp long) and found only about a 2-fold increase in colony number over standard desalted primers. If too few colonies are obtained, you may try to increase the amount of PCR product used and/or incubate the BP reaction overnight.

I sequenced one of your vectors after PCR amplification and observed a difference from what is provided online (or in the manual). Should I be concerned?

Our vectors have not been completely sequenced. Your sequence data may differ when compared to what is provided. Known mutations that do not affect the function of the vector are annotated in public databases.

Are your vectors routinely sequenced?

No, our vectors are not routinely sequenced. Quality control and release criteria utilize other methods.

How was the reference sequence for your vectors created?

Sequences provided for our vectors have been compiled from information in sequence databases, published sequences, and other sources.

What is the consensus Kozak sequence and what is the function of the Kozak sequence?

Eukaryotic (and specifically mammalian) mRNA contains sequence information that is important for efficient translation. However, this sequence, termed a Kozak sequence, is not a true ribosome binding site, but rather a translation initiation enhancer. The Kozak consensus sequence is ACCAUGG, where AUG is the initiation codon. A purine (A/G) in position -3 has a dominant effect; with a pyrimidine (C/T) in position -3, translation becomes more sensitive to changes in positions -1, -2, and +4. Expression levels can be reduced up to 95% when the -3 position is changed from a purine to pyrimidine. The +4 position has less influence on expression levels where approximately 50% reduction is seen. See the following references:

Kozak, M. (1986) Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell 44, 283-292.
Kozak, M. (1987) At least six nucleotides preceding the AUG initiator codon enhance translation in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 947-950.
Kozak, M. (1987) An analysis of 5´-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 8125-8148.
Kozak, M. (1989) The scanning model for translation: An update. J. Cell Biol. 108, 229-241.
Kozak, M. (1990) Evaluation of the fidelity of initiation of translation in reticulocyte lysates from commercial sources. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 2828.

Note: The optimal Kozak sequence for Drosophila differs slightly, and yeast do not follow this rule at all. See the following references:

Romanos, M.A., Scorer, C.A., Clare, J.J. (1992) Foreign gene expression in yeast: a review. Yeast 8, 423-488.
Cavaneer, D.R. (1987) Comparison of the consensus sequence flanking translational start sites in Drosophila and vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 1353-1361.

Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Expression Support Center.