Search
Search
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has become a cornerstone of modern cancer research, enabling investigators to uncover the complex molecular mechanisms that drive tumor development, progression, and therapeutic response. As oncology research increasingly moves toward precision medicine, the demand for accurate, scalable, and reproducible next-generation sequencing (NGS) solutions continues to grow.
Modern CGP approaches must be capable of detecting a wide spectrum of genomic alterations, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (indels), copy number variations (CNVs), gene fusions, and broader genomic signatures such as homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). Importantly, these capabilities must be maintained even when working with challenging samples such as samples with low quantity or quality.
To address these challenges, a multicenter research study evaluated the analytical performance of an amplicon-based NGS solution utilizing the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus for pan-cancer comprehensive molecular profiling.
The study was designed as a multicenter, in-house analytical evaluation conducted across five academic and clinical research laboratories in Europe. This design allowed the investigators to assess not only analytical accuracy but also reproducibility across independent laboratories, an essential requirement for translational cancer research.
A total of 193 pan-cancer research samples were included in the analysis, representing more than 13 distinct tumor types. These included common and rare malignancies such as lung cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, central nervous system (CNS) tumors, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and cancers of unknown primary (CUP), among others.
Figure 1. Distribution of tumor types for the analytical evaluation of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus. Other: includes tumor types represented by a single sample.
The cohort consisted of both DNA and RNA samples:
This dual-analyte design enabled the evaluation of a broad range of variant classes, including DNA-based alterations (SNVs, indels, CNVs, HRD, TMB, MSI) and RNA-based fusions.
All samples were pre-characterized using orthogonal reference methods, providing a robust benchmark against which the performance of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus could be assessed. These reference data included known:
The Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus is an amplicon-based NGS panel designed to enable comprehensive genomic profiling from a highly automated workflow. The assay covers more than 500 cancer-relevant genes, allowing simultaneous interrogation of multiple variant classes and genomic signatures.
Amplicon-based workflows are particularly well suited for research settings where sample quantity and quality may be limited. Each targeted NGS method has unique advantages, but a key benefit of using an amplicon-based sequencing method to interrogate solid tumor samples is that it requires less DNA and/or RNA than a hybrid capture–based method. The lower input requirement for amplicon-based sequencing is due to PCR-based amplification of short targeted sequences, which affords greater depth of coverage and high accuracy.
One of the most notable aspects of the study cohort was the wide variability in tumor cell content. Samples ranged from as low as 10–20% tumor cell content to near-pure tumor samples, reflecting real-world research conditions rather than idealized sample sets.
Low tumor purity is a well-recognized challenge in molecular profiling, as it can significantly impact variant detection sensitivity, particularly for low-allele-fraction variants.
Figure 2. Variability of tumor cell content in pan-cancer samples evaluated.
Despite this heterogeneity, the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus demonstrated a high overall sequencing success rate of approximately 94% across both DNA and RNA samples.
| Samples (n) | Success rate | |
| DNA | 140 | 96.6% |
| RNA | 61 | 89.7% |
| Overall (DNA and RNA) | 201 | 93.9% |
Table 1. Sequencing success rate of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus.
| Expected | Observed (≥5% AF*) | Observed (<5% AF) | Concordance** | |
| SNV | 258 | 241 | 5 | 95.3% |
| Indels | 32 | 28 | 1 | 90.6% |
| Total (SNVs and indels) | 290 | 269 | 6 | 94.8% |
Table 2. Concordance of results for SNV and indel detection.
* AF: allele fraction.
** Concordance was calculated irrespective of the 5% AF limit.
| Expected | Observed | Concordance | |
| Copy number gain (≥6 copy number) | 44.0% | 44 | 100.0% |
| Copy number loss (≤0.5-fold difference) | 13 | 11 | 84.6% |
| Total CNVs | 57 | 55 | 96.5% |
Table 3. Concordance of results for CNV detection.
Gene fusions represent an essential class of actionable alterations, particularly in solid tumors. In this study, fusion detection achieved an overall concordance of 94.2% when compared with orthogonal methods.
| Orthogonal method | |||
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus | Positive | 49 | 1 |
| Negative | 2 | 0 | |
| Concordance | 94.2% | ||
Table 4. Concordance of results for fusion detection.
| Cancer types | Samples (n) | Concordance | |
| HRD | Ovarian and breast cancer | 18 | 100.0% |
| TMB (≥10 mutations/Mb) | Pan-cancer | 32 | 81.3% |
| MSI | Pan-cancer | 26 | 80.8% |
| MSI | Colorectal cancer | 10 | 100.0% |
Table 5. Concordance of results for HRD, TMB, and MSI detection.
A major strength of the study was its assessment of reproducibility across five independent laboratories. The Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus demonstrated a median reproducibility of 94.0% for SNV and indel detection across sites.
In addition to variant detection, reproducibility was also observed for HRD, TMB, and MSI assessments when replicate samples were tested across laboratories. This consistency is essential for collaborative research efforts and multicenter translational studies.
In addition to variant detection, reproducibility was also observed for HRD, TMB, and MSI assessments when replicate samples were tested across laboratories. This consistency is essential for collaborative research efforts and multicenter translational studies.
The findings from this multicenter evaluation highlight the potential of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus as a sensitive, specific, and reproducible platform for comprehensive molecular profiling in research settings.
Key advantages demonstrated by the study include:
Based on this multicenter evaluation, the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus demonstrated excellent analytical performance for comprehensive genomic profiling. High concordance rates were observed for SNVs, indels, CNVs, fusions, and genomic signatures such as HRD, TMB, and MSI, even in challenging samples with low tumor content.
The study’s results underscore the assay’s potential to support advanced cancer research by enabling robust, scalable, and reproducible molecular profiling across diverse tumor types.
* The Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus is for research use only, and this analysis was performed as part of a retrospective clinical research study; no patient management decisions were made based on these results.
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.